Skip to main content

Think Systems, Think Institutions: Make Your Resolutions Stand Out

In the climate space are there some really really cool technologies coming out. From vertical wind turbines to building bricks made of scrap fabric, innovation is EVERYWHERE! 

However, the best resolutions for UNFCCC will be systems and institutions focused. If you read the text of most climate agreements, they won't hone in specific pieces of technologies but rather different types of technologies. We encourage you to understand specific pieces of technology to highlight why different groups are important! For example, bamboo straws are really cool but they are more importantly a piece of technology in the "alternatives to single-use plastics" group. 

We encourage delegates to present resolutions that focus on supporting institutions, creating reporting standards for member parties, and partnering with other United Nations institutions instead. Before the conference, we highly encourage delegates to look at the resolution wording of both the Paris Agreement and the Copenhagen Agreement as examples of the types of resolutions we are looking for. 

Furthermore, we encourage delegates to take NGOs as advising bodies instead of groups that enact the resolutions. For example, the World Wildlife Fund can write policy opinions in support of reducing plastic waste but they should not be the ones enacting the policies at the recommendation of this body.

Think Systems and Institutions, not specific pieces of technologies.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

šŸ’„CONFERENCE TONIGHTšŸ’„

We are so excited to get committee started! Here is a list of resources you should probably review before we tap the gavel and get started! 1. Read/Skim the background guide! 2. Review the delegate guide! 3. Read some of the posts on this blog because there are *hints* 4. Take a peak at our technical logistics slides 5. Read our conference policies! Oski is excited for conference!

Things to Consider: Forming Blocs in Committee

 Forming blocs in committee is often a tough and chaotic process! In a BMUN committee of our size, we expect approximately 3-4 blocs will write resolutions. Here are some guiding questions we hope delegates are considering when forming blocs. Is the topic a more regional or institutional question? If it is regionally based, find countries that are of the same region as you! If the topic focuses more on institutional systems, it is important to know what other countries have similar institutions! For example, Topic A is more regionally based while Topic B's focus on institutions is much clearer. Think about how your countries institutions might impact its opinions on the topic (ie. public universities, governmental research bodies, and intellectual property systems) What resolutions are compatible with your proposed solution? Are your resolutions more indicative of a long term solution or a short term one? Would your resolution be beneficial to include with others that target the sa...

Level Up Your MUN Knowledge: BMUN Jargon Check

  One of the biggest barriers to being a successful delegate is all of the complicated jargon that is used by both chairs and other delegates. A basic list of all BMUN related terms and how they can be used can be found here. Here are some more pieces of jargon that your chairs will use: "Most to least disruptive" indicates the order in which motions will be entertained and/or voted on. The motions that move the committee further from general procedure are most disruptive. With these rules the following motions are ordered from most to least disruptive: Points of Personal Privilege, Order, and Inquiry Motions to extend previous items such as unmods Motion to move into voting bloc Motion for a formal caucus Motion for an unmoderated caucus (longer unmoderated caucus are more disruptive!) Motion for a moderated caucus (longer total time for moderated caucus are more disruptive. If there are multiple motions with the same total time, the motion that would allow the most delegat...