Skip to main content

Dual Delegations In An Online World

 When I was a delegate going to conferences in the San Francisco Bay Area, the most difficult part was working with a partner in committees that are double assigned. Unless you were already good friends with your partner, working with another student for MUN was incredibly taxing. Not only was there always an unequal share of the research and position paper writing work but, in committee, it was hard to coordinate which resolutions we wanted to support and people that we wanted to work with. 

You are the expert on how you and your partner will split up roles in committee but here are some tips and considerations that made double assigned committees a blast:

Have Pre-defined Roles
These roles do not have to be set in stone but help provide a roadmap on how you and your partner will divide up the committee work. Who will be the content expert? Who will speak in moderated caucuses? Who will work the room in unmoderated caucuses? Who will make the call whether or not to support a resolution? Who will raise their hand to motion and/or vote in committee? You can play to your strengths in these predefined roles.

Have Clear Communication Throughout Conference
Be honest and clear to each other what is the best way to communicate with each other before and during the conference. Do you need to meet up ahead of time to work through a game plan? Does one of you only check their email once a day? When are NOT good times to reach out to your partner? 

Do Your Research!

Both delegates should come in with a solid knowledge for both topics. While it is common to divide up the position paper writing work, it is important to at least read your partner's paper before conference! Even better, read each other's work before you turn in the position paper to check for egregious grammar mistakes or plagiarism. Being knowledgeable about both topics will allow both you and your partner to stay engaged throughout the entirety of the conference!

Strategize for an Online World

There are some benefits to being on Zoom for the committee. The biggest one is that you will be at your computer the entire time! Unlike in person committee, you will be free to do last-minute research, fact check each other,and message each other. Other benefits are intrinsic to the Zoom platform such as the ability to see where all the other delegates are and keep better track of the flow of debate. Our unmoderated caucuses are held in breakout rooms which adds another dimension where stellar delegates can help facilitate conversations to their advantage. 

You are the Expert! What are some ways that the chairs can help make partner work online flow smoothly? 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Preparing for Resolution Writing: Important Tips

 Hi all! I hope you all are well-rested and ready to jump into committee this weekend! Our dais has a few tips to share regarding resolution writing, and what we hope to see in the solutions you all bring to the table. IF you have ever participated in BMUN before, this framework may sound familiar: be sure to brush up on these five tools to consider when drafting up language for committee! Great resolutions can contain many different details and writing styles, but it is important to always have specifics to make sure your solutions are conveyed as best as possible. Below is BMUN's S.M.A.R.T. framework for resolutions, geared towards creating working papers that highlight solutions to the best of their ability. Consider using each of these five elements when in committee! S- Specific: make sure your solutions include as many details as possible - there is no such thing as an irrelevant point in debate! Consider every perspective on the topics, and try to make sure there are no ling...

Don't Mess With Texas but Think of Its Infrastructure

 As more information about Texas' fatal and disastrous week with its energy system, the evidence points more and more towards the importance of infrastructure when it comes to thinking about energy distribution.  Texas is the #1 producer of wind energy in the United States and alone is #5 in the world (for reference, California generates less energy than states like Iowa and Oaklahoma) . As the news stories came out, some pundits pointed to this large wind energy generation as the reason for the entire grid's failures. However, a closer look at Texas' infrastructure may tell a different story. Texas is mostly energy independent from the rest of North America meaning that it cannot easily draw energy generated in surrounding states.  Louisiana borders Texas and faced similar extreme weather conditions but did not face the same extreme energy shortages.  Similarly, for committee, it is important for delegates to consider the larger infrastructural impacts of your prop...

A note on Carbon Pricing

 A number of delegates have proposed some sort of carbon price as a means to raise funding for different climate policies. This is definitely an interesting proposal but there are several things delegates should either clarify or consider before going down this pathway. Carbon Pricing policies are generally administrated by country or sub-national jurisdiction. Carbon prices are administered at this level because these are the levels that have the ability and some infrastructure set up already to administer, collect, and enforce taxes. The UNFCCC does not currently have the infrastructure to administer carbon pricing policies.  Furthermore, subsidies for clean energy in the past have been met with free trade concerns. The argument is that clean energy subsidies make a country's clean energy industry more competitive and could unfairly outperform the international market for the technology. Here is a link to the case China has leveled against EU environmental subsidies. Delegat...